littleflower
Member
Dear Admin,
Attached is a screen-shot of a post that is 'Not open to further replies' and the link (https://cor-mariae.com/threads/please-note.8163/#post-15207)View attachment 1623.
To follow up to the question raised by nanna:
When it comes to a few Priests, it seems that certain select individuals are given a free reign on cor-mariae to continually broadcast a litany of complaints that are kept open for further replies. However when a simple question is asked about Fr. Raphael, the matter becomes prudential in nature and 'Not open to further replies'?
If the faithful can be warned about Priests (e.g. Fr Pfeiffer and Fr Hewko) who have previously fallen out of favour with cor-mariae, why not other Priests who have recently fallen out of favour, like Fr Raphael?
In Catholic Charity and in fairness before God, the cor-mariae administration should provide an explanation and answer nanna's question.
Attached is a screen-shot of a post that is 'Not open to further replies' and the link (https://cor-mariae.com/threads/please-note.8163/#post-15207)View attachment 1623.
To follow up to the question raised by nanna:
When it comes to a few Priests, it seems that certain select individuals are given a free reign on cor-mariae to continually broadcast a litany of complaints that are kept open for further replies. However when a simple question is asked about Fr. Raphael, the matter becomes prudential in nature and 'Not open to further replies'?
If the faithful can be warned about Priests (e.g. Fr Pfeiffer and Fr Hewko) who have previously fallen out of favour with cor-mariae, why not other Priests who have recently fallen out of favour, like Fr Raphael?
In Catholic Charity and in fairness before God, the cor-mariae administration should provide an explanation and answer nanna's question.
